Flo First of all, I would like to call upon your good sens to

Regarding Exposé on Christianity, Flo

First of all, I would like to call upon your good sens to not take it from a philosophycal point of view, because the philosophy can not discern the divine mystery of God but the Holy Gost. second of all, let's be more rational about it, when Jesus said that that doesnt mean He had ignored the the purpose of this "sacrifice" not at all. Nailed on the cross, His human nature was in prey of an agonizing death.

Are you familiar of this french expression: "a vaincre sans peril on triomphe sans gloire" If God, the father, did not distant Himself and let Jesus endured the trial of this "sacrifice" all by himself, today He should not worthy to be called King of kings in the kingdom of God.Do you know, a few days before His death, on the mountain of Gethsemany, when the soldiers came to arrest, saint Peter drew his sword and cut off Marcus'ear in defense of Jesus, then Jesus said to Peter if I need help, I would call a myriad of Angels to come to rescue me. Furthermore, While agonizing on the cross, do you forget that He prayed His father (God)to not interfer, by making this prayer: "Father forgive them, because they dont know what they are doing" so how dare you said He didnt know the consequenses of this "sacrifice".

During the last super He symbolically explained it pretty well to the His disciples when He broke the bread drank the wine, He took the bread and the wine said " this is my flesh which will be broken and my blood which will be shed for your sins", you see, my friend, au contraire, He certainly knew about this"sacrifice" and He is God, the son, no God, the father.

I want you to pick on that!