Cacajaco, Very well said! I could not say it because I did not...

Tiba says...

cacajaco,

Very well said! I could not say it because I did not want to be viewed as anti free speech.

But Woodring seems to forget that Religion and politics don't go together under US constitution.

Therefore the blog must not be used for anyone's biblical views.

I assume there are many bloggers of different faith and religious affiliations, there are also those who just don't believe in God or in any organized religion.

What about the rights of these people not to get harassed by this religious fanatic Duvalier?

But again, what do I know?

The decision still lies in the hands of the big man, Woodring.

The topic is: Woodring Sain Preux/Duvalier
This is a reply to Msg 11359
Posted by Tiba on October 15 2008 at 12:23 PM

Messages in this topic

Woodring, Thank you for responding to my post so promptly, I really appreciate it. I don't think you have to delete all posts that are not politics, unless you give a clear definition of "politics." But it is clear to me and even to the cave ma > >
Tiba, 14-Oct-08 7:33 pm
Woodring, I'm a fundamental believer of free speech, and I do not think that you should kick this guy out just like that. I do think that you might want to post something to him, letting him know that you are the official owner of this site, and that > >
Linda, 14-Oct-08 8:01 pm
Woodring, this would be a fatal mistake to draw the line on which post to remove based on peer bloggers voting process. There is something fundamentally wrong with this kind of judgment. You have the right to remove any posts you deem necessary with > >
Cacajaco, 15-Oct-08 8:40 am
cacajaco, Very well said! I could not say it because I did not want to be viewed as anti free speech. But Woodring seems to forget that Religion and politics don't go together under US constitution. Therefore the blog must not be used for any > >
Tiba, 15-Oct-08 12:23 pm